Asus X99-M WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-M WS  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '18 at 23:12
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 134
2-Core 254
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 771
80% 642 Pts
64-Core 990
61% 990 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$230
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 192
Reflection 196
Parallax 204
157% 198 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 189
Splatting 129
120% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$100
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 284 202 157 139 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 437
Mixed 351
SusWrite 212
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 51.7
186% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 239
206% 305 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
713GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 107 108 108 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 124
Write 68.5
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 107
71% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 134 138 139 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 152
Write 133
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 137
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 83%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 50
MC Mixed 38.7
123% 43 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 20.5
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 59.3
68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 111%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-M WS Builds (Compare 150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $590
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback