Acer AcerPower FG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 3.93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer AcerPower FG (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer E915GVM
Memory	1.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20051220
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '18 at 16:00
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	88%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.06GHz-$120 856 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	3.93% Terrible	Memory 3.08 1-Core 19.6 2-Core 28.4 9% 17 Pts	4-Core 27.2 8-Core 29.1 4% 28.2 Pts	64-Core 24.2 2% 24.2 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 3.93% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$43 19,180 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 44 26 80 69 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Read 56.8 Write 56.3 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 46.6 35% 47.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 69%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 26GB free Firmware: 10.01E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 51 51 51 52 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 42 Write 38.3 Mixed 32.2 SusWrite 49 30% 40.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 33%
ST950032 5AS 500GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 3GB free, PID 2063 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 19 19 14 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	9.63% Terrible	Read 22.6 Write 20.6 Mixed 17.9 SusWrite 16 26% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.63% Great: 18%
USB FLASH DRIVE 8GB 2,112 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID b113 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 6.3 6.8 6.8 5.9 7.1 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	3.98% Terrible	Read 14.4 Write 4.2 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 6.1 7% 6.62 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.98% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	6.82% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 2 MC Mixed 2.5 7% 2.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 1.4 SC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.8 GB/s	Latency 473 8% 473 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 6.82% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Acer AcerPower FG

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)