Asus X99-M WS

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-M WS (all builds)
Memory	27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '18 at 10:48
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 106 2-Core 180 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 601 56% 467 Pts	64-Core 804 50% 804 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.8% Excellent	Lighting 101 Reflection 113 Parallax 101 82% 105 fps	MRender 96 Gravity 97.9 Splatting 100 80% 98 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 191 99 34 29 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 422 Write 235 Mixed 350 SusWrite 77 60% 271 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 67.8 4K Mixed 38.1 131% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 31.6 70% 144 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 134%
PNY CS1311 960GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 62GB free Firmware: 1122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 283 192 150 75 111 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.6% Average	Read 179 Write 151 Mixed 264 SusWrite 170 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 57.4 4K Mixed 30.2 72% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 212 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 1.7 50% 122 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2400 C10 4x8GB 272 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 40.9 MC Write 43.1 MC Mixed 40.5 119% 41.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 18.8 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-M WS Builds (Compare 150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	39x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	23x
Core i7-5960XIntel $400Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	17x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	13x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	12x

SSD
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $182Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	5x

RAM
M393A1G40DB1-CRC 4x8GBSamsungBench 99%, 225 samples	7x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	6x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $590

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359