Asus X99-M WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics81% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-M WS  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '18 at 09:55
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 183
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 628
57% 476 Pts
64-Core 810
50% 810 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81% Excellent
Lighting 99.7
Reflection 116
Parallax 100
81% 105 fps
MRender 98.2
Gravity 98.7
Splatting 97.8
80% 98.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 414
Write 406
Mixed 345
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 38.8
132% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 240
173% 220 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
PNY CS1311 960GB
94GB free
Firmware: 1122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 331 362 346 136 281 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 425
Write 346
Mixed 328
SusWrite 303
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 30.7
109% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 147
119% 169 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2400 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 40.3
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 104%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-M WS Builds (Compare 150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $590
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback