Asrock FM2A75M-DGS

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A75M-DGS (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20121123
Uptime	8.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '18 at 17:53
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 78.1 1-Core 68.3 2-Core 122 55% 89.4 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 203 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Lighting 18.8 Reflection 14.7 Parallax 18 15% 17.2 fps	MRender 15.9 Gravity 18.1 Splatting 19.8 15% 18 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 87 92 91 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 152 Write 127 Mixed 144 SusWrite 89.3 29% 128 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 61.4 4K Mixed 17.9 90% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 118 98% 141 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 61%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 457GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 76 78 78 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 63.8 Write 63.5 Mixed 51.5 SusWrite 77.3 47% 64 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 65%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 158GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 93 93 93 94 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 90 Write 80.5 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 93 60% 81 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GAR 16GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 667, 667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.4% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 6.1 18% 6.13 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 7.2 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 84.1 48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A75M-DGS Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M-DGS

CPU
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	11x
A8-5500 APUAMD $135Bench 48%, 10,478 samples	7x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	7x

GPU
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	4x
Radeon HD 8670DAMDBench 5%, 5,822 samples	3x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	2x

RAM
KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBKingstonBench 41%, 1,116 samples	3x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	2x
F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 8GBUnknownBench 36%, 160 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16