Asrock B75M-GL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B75M-GL  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120530
Uptime3 Days
Run DateNov 23 '18 at 08:23
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 406
54% 402 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Asus(1043 02AC) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.850.0.0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 9.12
Parallax 3.75
5% 6.36 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 7.74
5% 5.86 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 76 61 64 50 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 493
Write 457
Mixed 368
SusWrite 100
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 41.3
139% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 327
246% 329 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
726GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 159 159 159 160 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 160
Mixed 81
SusWrite 158
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905402-475.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-GL Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B75M-GL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback