Asrock B75M-GL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B75M-GL  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120530
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '18 at 09:34
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 208
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 385
53% 391 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Asus(1043 02AC) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.850.0.0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 9.12
Parallax 3.78
5% 6.37 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 7.91
5% 5.92 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 492
Write 456
Mixed 352
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 39.3
138% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 328
244% 324 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
712GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 156 155 157 156 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 157
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 156
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905402-475.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 18.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-GL Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B75M-GL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback