Viglen DQ77MK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemViglen DQ77MK  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ77MK
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20181025
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 22 '18 at 22:51
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$197
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 93
2-Core 184
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 369
49% 368 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
PwrHis(1787 2335) 2GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.11.1
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.12% Terrible
Lighting 5.27
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 9.47
4% 6.36 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 3.43
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.12%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 115 115 111 116 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 453
Write 144
Mixed 188
SusWrite 115
49% 225 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 32.9
118% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 125
106% 157 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 81%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
931GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 135 134 134 135 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 114
Write 146
Mixed 74
SusWrite 134
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 8634 SUPERTALENT02 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 17.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ77MK Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Viglen DQ77MK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback