Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140319
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '18 at 21:25
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	39%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 94.7 1-Core 101 2-Core 195 76% 130 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 503 52% 418 Pts	64-Core 497 31% 497 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85B6) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Lighting 77.5 Reflection 79.2 Parallax 68 63% 74.9 fps	MRender 71.9 Gravity 72.2 Splatting 74.5 60% 72.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 505 Write 488 Mixed 459 108% 484 MB/s	4K Read 44 4K Write 85.5 4K Mixed 55.1 182% 61.5 MB/s	DQ Read 392 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 364 274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 71GB free Firmware: 71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 77 53 52 45 53 MB/s Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.6% Above average	Read 218 Write 110 Mixed 177 SusWrite 81.2 33% 147 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 66.1 4K Mixed 21.7 100% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 161 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 124 109% 160 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 85%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 141GB free Firmware: DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,675 Write 5,260 Mixed 5,238 1,204% 5,391 MB/s	4K Read 328 4K Write 172 4K Mixed 210 857% 237 MB/s	DQ Read 823 DQ Write 399 DQ Mixed 584 440% 602 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB 411 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	89.5% Excellent	MC Read 32.6 MC Write 37.5 MC Mixed 32.9 98% 34.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.2 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 57.8 69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X79-UP4 Builds (Compare 898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 - $480

CPU
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	281x
Core i7-4930KIntel $90Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	195x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	187x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	55x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	47x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	45x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	21x

RAM
DDR3 1866 4x4GBAdataBench 68%, 420 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 60%, 738 samples	16x
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 2,734 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $802

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16