Asrock Z77 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130701
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 22 '18 at 15:28
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$192
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 204
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 522
52% 425 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 19.2
17% 18.8 fps
MRender 23.9
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 16.1
16% 20.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C3G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 127 129 135 123 125 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.4% Average
Read 126
Write 190
Mixed 158
SusWrite 131
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 24.9
83% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 123
105% 154 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 89%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 5.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 47 71 80 89 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 111
Write 80
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 77.4
67% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 105%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 45 73 76 78 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 116
Write 118
Mixed 59
SusWrite 71.4
67% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 106%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
2TB free, PID 2771
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.3% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 25.7
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 26.9
36% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DCLT8GN128S 830B M2X4G64CB8HG9N-DG 86D3 DCLT8GN128S 830B M2X4G64CB8HG9N-DG 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.9% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 17.2
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 767 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme6 - $236

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $696
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback