Dell OptiPlex 980

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 980
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 980  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180227
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 21 '18 at 17:21
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 130
57% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 199
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 550
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB
CLim: 1279 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 23.7
16% 25.5 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 33.1
22% 26.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 20 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.1% Below average
Read 143
Write 94
Mixed 147
SusWrite 20
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 20.5
78% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.8
DQ Write 65.9
DQ Mixed 27.6
26% 39.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 100%
Sm611gx8 BA 8GB
1GB free
Firmware: M0425A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 24% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5273DH0-CH9 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.1% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 980 Builds (Compare 829 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 980

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback