Dell OptiPlex 980

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 980
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 980  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '18 at 15:05
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 66
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 110
51% 83.4 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 205
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 550
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 22.5
15% 24.2 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 32.2
21% 25.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 3 8.8 17 19 8.5 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29% Poor
Read 217
Write 84.6
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 12.3
21% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 14.6
60% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.5
DQ Write 32
DQ Mixed 19.2
17% 25.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29%
Great: 100%
Sm611gx8 BA 8GB
1GB free
Firmware: M0425A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 5 10 21 21 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 24% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5273DH0-CH9 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.8% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 9.5
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 980 Builds (Compare 829 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 980

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback