Dell Studio 1747

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell Studio 1747  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0J509P
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110331
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '18 at 20:09
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 92.5
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 111
59% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 203
22% 174 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Dell(1028 02EB) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Lighting 4.37
Reflection 6.35
Parallax 2.78
4% 4.5 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 2.97
Splatting 6
4% 4.56 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX2 60GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 32 30 33 31 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 134
Write 57.9
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 32.9
16% 74 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 11.6
42% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 54.2
DQ Mixed 10.7
27% 59 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 51%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
82GB free
Firmware: 0004SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 60 66 68 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 89.5
Write 88.6
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 65.2
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 58%
Seagate BUP Slim 500GB
199GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 22 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 20.9
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 22.7
31% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 859B CT51264BC1339.M16F 6GB
1066, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.6% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio 1747 Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio 1747

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback