Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory18.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '18 at 20:07
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 139
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 227
31% 228 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1955 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 66
Reflection 73.9
Parallax 71.9
54% 70.6 fps
MRender 83.3
Gravity 66
Splatting 60
56% 69.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple TS128C 121GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CJAA0201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 140 172 176 179 160 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 181
Write 187
Mixed 124
SusWrite 162
37% 163 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 25.5
81% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 17.7
DQ Write 78.3
DQ Mixed 21.6
24% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 49%
GB0500EAFYL 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 113 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 112
Write 111
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 112
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 65%
GB0500EAFYL 500GB
452GB free
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 112 111 111 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 116
Write 107
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 112
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 65%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
9GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 24.7
Write 10.7
Mixed 13.9
SusWrite 11.1
18% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.7
108% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback