Gigabyte GA-MD70-HB1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MD70-HB1  (all builds)
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180622
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateNov 17 '18 at 11:43
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 189
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 649
61% 507 Pts
64-Core 2,211
137% 2,211 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.10.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.3% Above average
Lighting 66.6
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 92.5
54% 75.9 fps
MRender 69.6
Gravity 64.5
Splatting 57.3
52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS960GSSD220S 960GB
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0G1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 378 382 385 387 384 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 285
Mixed 353
SusWrite 384
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 41.9
139% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 241
196% 277 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 117%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 156 143 183 153 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 248
Write 250
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 160
135% 185 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.6
597% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 118%
Great: 168%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 8TB
412GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 152 139 179 150 181 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 48.5
Write 58
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 156
51% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.4
142% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 168%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965589-033.D00G 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
102% Outstanding
MC Read 50.8
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 36.5
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 102%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MD70-HB1 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MD70-HB1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback