Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 22:45
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$379
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 255
94% 163 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 714
74% 581 Pts
64-Core 710
48% 710 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$790
MSI(1462 3721) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.2% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 45.9
Parallax 37.3
32% 41 fps
MRender 56.9
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 51.9
34% 49.5 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 141%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS960GSSD220S 960GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0510G1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 458 463 462 258 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 453
Mixed 374
SusWrite 374
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 57.2
192% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 238
200% 289 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
202GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 306 307 307 307 307 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 486
Mixed 394
SusWrite 324
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 61.4
212% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 122%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$80
234GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 95 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 109
Write 100
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 95.5
67% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D30BESB.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 28.7
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 41.6
SC Mixed 29.2
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 59.3
67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 96%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,153
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback