Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '18 at 00:33
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 45%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 874
82% 679 Pts
64-Core 1,392
86% 1,392 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.16
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 154
Reflection 160
Parallax 148
126% 154 fps
Gravity 151
Splatting 96.6
106% 124 fps
Poor: 93% Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 38 39 40 44 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 483
Write 443
Mixed 331
SusWrite 80.5
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 43.4
148% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 238
216% 328 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
17GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 496
Write 437
Mixed 386
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 44.8
155% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 361
274% 369 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
115GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 78 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 86.3
Write 83.8
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 79.7
61% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 67%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
31GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 68.7
Write 96.9
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 99.1
59% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 75%
GALAX TA 1D0120A 120GB
4GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 224
Write 155
Mixed 153
215% 178 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 0.2
843% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.1
DQ Write 35.7
DQ Mixed 23.4
2,011% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 156% Great: 162%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 48.9
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 36.1
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 35.2
103% 36 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 117%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,030 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,090
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback