Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675 4,275 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 2, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Memory 75.5 1-Core 48.9 2-Core 149 53% 91.1 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 540 41% 369 Pts	64-Core 1,035 64% 1,035 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5016 254GB 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 30 29 31 33 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	144% Outstanding	Read 1,898 Write 55.3 Mixed 99.9 SusWrite 29.3 109% 520 MB/s	4K Read 88 4K Write 19.2 4K Mixed 38.2 192% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 54.3 DQ Mixed 97.1 103% 180 MB/s

IBM ServeRAID M5016 40TB 764GB free Firmware: 3.27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1077 1102 1102 1023 1156 974 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	223% Outstanding	Read 1,723 Write 1,871 Mixed 1,851 SusWrite 1,072 367% 1,630 MB/s	4K Read 82.6 4K Write 62.6 4K Mixed 66 243% 70.4 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 307 233% 312 MB/s

ADATA NH03 3TB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 408GB free, PID a03a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 46 50 41 47 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	26% Poor	Read 71.2 Write 83.2 Mixed 46.4 SusWrite 47 83% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 12x4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 12 of 12 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.7% Above average	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 21.1 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 6 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 89.3 45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16