HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-00xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-00xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 843B
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180611
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateNov 16 '18 at 03:12
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 126
2-Core 251
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 718
75% 603 Pts
64-Core 734
45% 734 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
HP(103C 8465) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2142 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
32.4% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 38.7
32% 36.9 fps
MRender 44.6
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 37.2
33% 40.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 175 175 176 174 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 822
Write 319
Mixed 535
SusWrite 184
103% 465 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 53.6
188% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 322
230% 292 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 115%
Great: 139%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
476GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 123 133 133 130 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 129
Write 120
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 130
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 107%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
514GB free
Firmware: JP4OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 110 109 110 108 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 118
Write 122
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 110
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 74%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
19GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 38 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 32.8
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 37.5
43% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 04CD F4-2666C19-8GNT 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
87% Excellent
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 24.7
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 26.6
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-00xx Builds (Compare 1,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-00xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback