HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-00xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-00xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 843B
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180611
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateNov 04 '18 at 07:58
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 125
2-Core 249
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 727
76% 610 Pts
64-Core 731
45% 731 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
HP(103C 8465) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 39.8
33% 38 fps
MRender 47.3
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 38.7
34% 42 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 183 184 184 182 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 793
Write 396
Mixed 556
SusWrite 192
107% 484 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 51.8
180% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 304
224% 294 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 112%
Great: 139%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
476GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 122 131 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 131
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 129
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 107%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
524GB free
Firmware: JP4OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 112 113 112 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 113
Write 119
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 113
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 74%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
19GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 37 38 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 33.1
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 37.6
44% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 04CD F4-2666C19-8GNT 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 25.1
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 24.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-00xx Builds (Compare 1,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-00xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback