| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 8.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP EliteBook 8770w (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 176C |
| Memory | 19 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20131008 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 15 '18 at 13:54 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67%
Good
|
65% 111 Pts
|
44% 352 Pts
|
27% 440 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 7700M
HP(103C 176C) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.2.1
|
8.54%
Terrible
|
8% 11.9 fps
|
9% 10.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 138 137 141 84 61 MB/s
|
35.7%
Below average
|
45% 201 MB/s
|
53% 12.3 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
339GB free
Firmware: GH2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 115 115 115 114 MB/s
|
66.2%
Good
|
67% 92.8 MB/s
|
146% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
96GB free, PID 5581, SANDISK ULTRA 128GB
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 19 18 12 MB/s
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
30% 26.2 MB/s
|
145% 3.5 MB/s
| |
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 564 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP EliteBook 8770w
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples | 99x |
| Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples | 92x |
| Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples | 82x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples | 296x |
| Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples | 95x |
| Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples | 25x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $100 |