Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180907
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '18 at 23:53
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Memory 77.2 1-Core 128 2-Core 257 84% 154 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 868 81% 673 Pts	64-Core 1,387 86% 1,387 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 36FE) CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Lighting 145 Reflection 152 Parallax 132 118% 143 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 139 Splatting 112 100% 124 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 227 238 244 243 239 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 474 Write 447 Mixed 349 SusWrite 256 86% 382 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 97.2 4K Mixed 50 175% 62.1 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 213 202% 314 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 118%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB 2,229 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 621GB free Firmware: JC4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 104 104 104 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 106 Write 99.5 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 102 66% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 64%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 115 120 120 122 120 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 11GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.1 6.1 12 8.9 5.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 113 Write 11.2 Mixed 18.2 SusWrite 6.2 33% 37.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 3.7 237% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$201 13,611 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.2% Very good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 25.1 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 22.2 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 85.8 47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	202x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,013

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16