Today's hottest deals

AMD Mandolin-PCO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAMD Mandolin-PCO  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Mandolin-PCO
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime11.8 Days
Run DateNov 14 '18 at 22:59
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Eng Sample: ZM370SC4T4MFG_38/22_Y
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 68.9
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 158
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 541
51% 422 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon PICASSO Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 14
Parallax 20.8
13% 16.9 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 16
Splatting 17.4
13% 15.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 52 56 77 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 84.2
Write 87
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 62.8
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3300ME78HBF-2666 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 1333 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.7% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 26.9
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 21.4
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Mandolin-PCO Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: AMD Mandolin-PCO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback