Asus MAXIMUS VII IMPACT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII IMPACT  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '18 at 07:06
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 87.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 248
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 697
72% 577 Pts
64-Core 694
43% 694 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 367B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.1% Average
Lighting 55.9
Reflection 65
Parallax 69.3
46% 63.4 fps
MRender 74.1
Gravity 65.9
Splatting 57.9
53% 66 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$65
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 344 337 373 389 351 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 413
Write 410
Mixed 296
SusWrite 351
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 27.5
90% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 219
164% 219 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 119%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
164GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 347 345 376 391 360 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 417
Mixed 352
SusWrite 356
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 39.9
117% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 194
170% 259 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII IMPACT Builds (Compare 240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII IMPACT - $235

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $883
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback