Monster TULPAR T7

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Monster TULPAR T7 (all builds)
Motherboard	Monster TULPAR T7
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141201
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '18 at 14:30
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$48 15,557 User benchmarks, average bench 60% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 101 2-Core 198 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 510 55% 437 Pts	64-Core 519 32% 519 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M 21,995 User benchmarks, average bench 31% MSI(1462 112D) 3GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1634 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Lighting 42.9 Reflection 46.6 Parallax 40.2 35% 43.2 fps	MRender 49 Gravity 19.6 Splatting 40.7 30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 119GB 1,052 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 72GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 121 134 138 137 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 355 Write 157 Mixed 199 SusWrite 134 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 74.6 4K Mixed 35.9 131% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 162 123% 167 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 101%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$62 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 534GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 52 54 48 84 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 115 Write 113 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 62.5 65% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GKH800SO51208-1600 Kingston KHX1600C9S3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9S3/4GX 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.2% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 13.1 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 15.7 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T7

CPU
Core i7-4710MQIntel $48Bench 60%, 15,557 samples	54x
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	6x
Core i7-4900MQIntel $110Bench 68%, 5,651 samples	4x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	35x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	18x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	7x

SSD
850 EVO mSATA 250GBSamsungBench 95%, 4,026 samples	5x
MKNSSDAT120GB-DX 120GBMushkinBench 59%, 222 samples	4x
MKNSSDAT240GB-DX 240GBMushkinBench 61%, 135 samples	3x

RAM
2x8GBGKH800SO51208-1600Bench 54%, 664 samples	22x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	15x
1x8GBGKH800SO51208-1600Bench 29%, 1,721 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $48

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16