Dell Latitude E6510

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E6510  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0N5KHN
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110215
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateNov 11 '18 at 18:44
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 91.2
1-Core 34.6
2-Core 65.2
46% 63.7 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 167
18% 144 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 3100M
Dell(1028 040B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.73
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.54 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.04
2% 2.11 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU655 120GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01b10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 196 195 194 128 126 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.5% Below average
Read 214
Write 188
Mixed 178
SusWrite 174
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 15.2
47% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 73.5
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 112
89% 120 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
630GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 113 112 114 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 58.5
Mixed 40
SusWrite 113
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.1
85% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273DH0-YH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.4% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6510 Builds (Compare 318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback