Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '18 at 18:28
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 146
2-Core 289
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 785
81% 653 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 197
Parallax 198
153% 195 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 185
Splatting 125
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$69
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 912
Write 848
Mixed 566
172% 776 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 48.8
180% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 518
DQ Write 619
DQ Mixed 440
368% 526 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 185%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
121GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 87 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 104
Write 99.4
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 85.9
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
73GB free
Firmware: 1AA01109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 49 49 48 48 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 68.5
Write 61.3
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 49.1
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 60%
SAMSUNG HD400LD 400GB
2GB free, PID 2507
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 32 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 32.8
Mixed 24
SusWrite 31.1
40% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB-$68
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.8% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,024
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback