HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 838F
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180523
Uptime27 Days
Run DateNov 11 '18 at 15:02
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 156
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 478
42% 360 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
HP(103C 838F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9836
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.49% Terrible
Lighting 7.57
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 29.2
6% 20.7 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 8.47
Splatting 23
16% 19.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 9.49%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 63 13 86 73 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 332
Write 211
Mixed 220
SusWrite 73.2
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 12.2
49% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 31.8
DQ Write 29
DQ Mixed 21
18% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 52%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
807GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 126 126 128 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 141
Write 127
Mixed 32
SusWrite 128
77% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
109% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 77%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A5244BB0-CRC 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.3% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 19.3
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 19.4
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback