ECS A790GXM-AD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardECS A790GXM-AD3  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '18 at 18:21
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 440-$50
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 44.5
2-Core 88.5
44% 68.7 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 132
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 275-$250
EVGA(3842 1171) 896MB
Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
9.64% Terrible
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 9.69
Parallax 6
11% 9.68 fps
MRender 9.62
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 7
7% 9.14 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.64%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 11 11 13 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.91% Terrible
Read 6
Write 8
Mixed 8
SusWrite 11.1
6% 8.27 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 4.91%
Great: 69%
GB0160EAFJE 160GB
46GB free
Firmware: HPG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 26 25 26 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 12.8
Write 20.4
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 24.7
14% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CM3X2G1600C9DHX CM3X2G1600C9DHX 9905402-532.A00LF 9905402-532.A00LF 12GB
533, 533, 533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.1% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A790GXM-AD3 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A790GXM-AD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $179
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback