Asus F1A75-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-M LE  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '18 at 18:02
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 76.8
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 92.3
46% 71.3 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 188
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.10.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Lighting 63.6
Reflection 63.6
Parallax 75.6
52% 67.6 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 57.6
Splatting 52.4
47% 58.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 375 405 422 436 425 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 437
Write 412
Mixed 336
SusWrite 403
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 25.8
97% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 268
202% 271 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
421GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 395 427 431 446 355 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 450
Write 400
Mixed 406
SusWrite 403
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 29.7
108% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 270
203% 272 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 129%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
257GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 86.9
Write 87.8
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 87.9
56% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-M LE Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $35
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback