Dell Latitude E5430 non-vPro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude E5430 non-vPro  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0MYF02
Memory10.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '18 at 12:12
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3360M-$594
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 78.1
2-Core 143
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 197
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 053C) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.91% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 5.77
Parallax 2.97
4% 4.36 fps
MRender 5.24
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.26
5% 5.31 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.91%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
449GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 452 457 443 426 276 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 443
Mixed 431
SusWrite 417
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 28.8
102% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 129%
SanDisk Cruzer Facet 8GB
4GB free, PID 5576
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.3 4 4.1 3.8 4.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 33.9
Write 6.5
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 4.2
14% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.1
135% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 859B CT102464BF160B.M16 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E5430 non-vPro Builds (Compare 529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E5430 non-vPro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback