User System

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Razer Blade
Motherboard	Razer C1_MB
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180706
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '18 at 19:39
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	25%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 67.7 2-Core 125 60% 94.5 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 336 37% 290 Pts	64-Core 650 40% 650 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.65% Terrible	Lighting 6.83 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 6.81 6% 8.39 fps	MRender 11 Gravity 6.27 Splatting 13.7 9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.65% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$249 10,709 User benchmarks, average bench 290% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1500 1513 1486 1155 1140 1106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	197% Outstanding	Read 920 Write 1,502 Mixed 923 SusWrite 1,317 265% 1,165 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 82 4K Mixed 37.1 138% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 916 DQ Write 799 DQ Mixed 842 635% 852 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 371%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27 3,642 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 24GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 24 26 24 24 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	70% Very good	Read 167 Write 11.7 Mixed 66.4 SusWrite 25.4 69% 67.6 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 9.1 767% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 17.8 DQ Write 18.1 DQ Mixed 12.1 1,093% 16 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.3% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 21.8 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 23.6 SC Mixed 23.2 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16