Motherboard H67ITX-C-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMotherboard H67ITX-C-E  (all builds)
MotherboardZOTAC H67ITX-C-E
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '18 at 02:10
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 205
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 500
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Lighting 72.9
Reflection 73.7
Parallax 63.8
59% 70.1 fps
MRender 76
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 69.1
59% 72.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 163 151 168 168 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 462
Write 428
Mixed 392
SusWrite 193
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 25.6
88% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 201
185% 284 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 97%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
339GB free
Firmware: 0002DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 106 107 110 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 88.8
Write 58.8
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 107
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67ITX-C-E Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Motherboard H67ITX-C-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $263
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback