Asrock 960GC-GS FX

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock 960GC-GS FX (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '18 at 18:13
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	84%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 94.1 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 142 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 421 43% 346 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Gigabyte(1458 22BD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1540 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.3 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Lighting 69.3 Reflection 64.3 Parallax 85.9 56% 73.2 fps	MRender 64.1 Gravity 58 Splatting 82.6 57% 68.2 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GSSD340K 128GB 245 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN216 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 143 147 156 155 142 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.7% Above average	Read 247 Write 157 Mixed 148 SusWrite 146 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 32.7 110% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 88.2 82% 127 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 168GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 85 87 88 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 81.5 Write 88.8 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 86.5 59% 79.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 16.4 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 11.8 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 59.6 67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 960GC-GS FX Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 960GC-GS FX - $122

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	30x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	13x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
T253X1120G 120GBTeamBench 65%, 1,708 samples	5x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	43x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	32x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16