Notebook P65xHP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNotebook P65xHP  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P65xHP
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '18 at 13:46
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 207
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 587
58% 473 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 65A1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.8% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 7.16
6% 8.21 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 14.1
9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.8%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 509 171 205 54 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 862
Write 583
Mixed 590
SusWrite 192
124% 557 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 47.1
169% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 558
DQ Mixed 323
273% 387 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 117%
Great: 157%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
116GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 117 118 118 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 99.8
Write 93.7
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 117
60% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix GKE400SO51208-2400AH 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
76.1% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 22
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 23.6
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P65xHP Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Notebook P65xHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback