Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T3010 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB175
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.1 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20031215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '18 at 22:12
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium M processor 1400MHz 17 User benchmarks, average bench 25% Onboard, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Memory 54.1 1-Core 7.7 2-Core 11.2 21% 24.3 Pts	4-Core 13.3 8-Core 14.1 2% 13.7 Pts	64-Core 14 1% 14 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 30%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHT2060AT 60GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 009B SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 4.6 4.1 3.6 4 6.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	2.81% Terrible	Read 5.1 Write 6.5 Mixed 7.1 SusWrite 4.7 4% 5.85 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.81% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	6.25% Terrible	MC Read 1.8 MC Write 1.7 MC Mixed 1.2 4% 1.57 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 1.4 SC Mixed 1.2 4% 1.4 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.25% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16