User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardEVGA X299 DARK
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181024
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 05 '18 at 15:34
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 262
95% 169 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1,125
100% 845 Pts
64-Core 1,644
102% 1,644 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6598) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2952 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,158
Write 1,441
Mixed 585
306% 1,395 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 57.3
247% 99.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,047
DQ Write 1,076
DQ Mixed 764
656% 962 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Blue 500GB-$93
336GB free
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 309 303 292 292 289 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 487
Mixed 353
SusWrite 315
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 52.7
188% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 253
206% 293 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 111%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67
233GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 403 390 395 399 400 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 485
Mixed 383
SusWrite 408
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 54.1
192% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 282
231% 330 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 121%
Great: 117%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 177 179 176 177 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 191
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 177
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 60.6
MC Mixed 31
118% 41.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 12
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 106%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback