Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory61.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '18 at 14:57
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 110
2-Core 213
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 688
66% 545 Pts
64-Core 1,705
106% 1,705 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200
Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 7.5GB, Driver: 391.25
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 29% Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 386
Write 119
Mixed 188
50% 231 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 29.7
109% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 159
121% 164 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 80%
Sandisk S12 126GB
107GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 433
Write 236
Mixed 100
56% 257 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 11.1
46% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 32.6
DQ Write 18.5
DQ Mixed 18.8
16% 23.3 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
691GB free
Firmware: JC4A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 116
Write 62.1
Mixed 80.7
65% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.2% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback