MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180809
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateNov 04 '18 at 04:42
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 78
1-Core 128
2-Core 252
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 1,000
89% 753 Pts
64-Core 2764
171% 2764 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3553 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 210
Parallax 266
119% 207 fps
MRender 244
Gravity 228
Splatting 154
165% 209 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 128%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 472 463 476 469 476 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 480
Mixed 398
SusWrite 472
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 58.5
196% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 316
250% 348 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
SSD 1TB
858GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 415 417 258 99 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 351
Mixed 336
SusWrite 283
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 35.9
144% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 195
167% 243 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB-$193
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
174% Outstanding
MC Read 71.5
MC Write 66.7
MC Mixed 68.2
197% 68.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 44.3
SC Mixed 30.5
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 174%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $794
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback