TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180809
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateOct 28 '18 at 16:03
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 76.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 240
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 936
83% 702 Pts
64-Core 2,442
151% 2,442 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 81.8%
 Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Zotac(19DA 1503)
CLim: 2340 MHz, MLim: 3699 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
135% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 212
Parallax 267
129% 212 fps
MRender 271
Gravity 229
Splatting 156
172% 219 fps
Poor: 128% ↑
This bench: 135%
 Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 463 460 465 467 470 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 462
Mixed 284
SusWrite 464
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 40.6
156% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 225
181% 254 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 134%
SSD 1TB
858GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 415 405 306 136 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 442
Write 163
Mixed 324
SusWrite 296
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 34.4
139% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 173
143% 205 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 88%
 Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB-$193
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
169% Outstanding
MC Read 67.3
MC Write 66.3
MC Mixed 67.4
191% 67 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 29
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 169%
 Great: 142%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD  $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples125x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD  $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples45x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD  $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples37x
GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples39x
RTX 2080Nvidia  $270Bench 124%, 316,424 samples19x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples15x
SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples13x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples13x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 10,311 samples12x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL  $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples9x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 8x8GBUnknownBench 160%, 29 samples5x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $794
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback