Biostar Viotech 3200+

Performance Results

Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar Viotech 3200+  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '18 at 17:41
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
VIA C7-D 1800MHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Memory 30.2
1-Core 6.8
2-Core 7.4
12% 14.8 Pts
4-Core 7.2
8-Core 7.3
1% 7.25 Pts
64-Core 7
0% 7 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20% Very poor
Lighting 17.1
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 38.7
14% 26.4 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 40
Splatting 38
32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 20%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP800 32GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.2a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 25 16 30 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 96.1
Write 31.8
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 20.3
11% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 18.4
70% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 30.3
DQ Mixed 25.3
20% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5674EB0-YK0 M378B5674EB0-YK0 4GB
0, 0 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.37% Terrible
MC Read 1.7
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 2.1
7% 2.57 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 254
16% 254 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback