Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
VIA C7-D 1800MHz 46 User benchmarks, average bench 17% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Memory 30.2 1-Core 6.8 2-Core 7.4 12% 14.8 Pts	4-Core 7.2 8-Core 7.3 1% 7.25 Pts	64-Core 7 0% 7 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	20% Very poor	Lighting 17.1 Reflection 23.3 Parallax 38.7 14% 26.4 fps	MRender 38.8 Gravity 40 Splatting 38 32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP800 32GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.0.2a SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 25 16 30 30 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Read 96.1 Write 31.8 Mixed 52.1 SusWrite 20.3 11% 50.1 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 31.6 4K Mixed 18.4 70% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 24.5 DQ Write 30.3 DQ Mixed 25.3 20% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M378B5674EB0-YK0 M378B5674EB0-YK0 4GB 0, 0 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.37% Terrible	MC Read 1.7 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.57 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 254 16% 254 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM