Positivo POS-VVCN896BD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 2.44%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemPositivo POS-VVCN896BD  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-VVCN896BD
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '19 at 16:57
Run Duration835 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
VIA C7-D 1800MHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
SC Int 15.5
SC Float 4.8
SC Mixed 5
7% 8.43 Pts
QC Int 15.8
QC Float 6.7
QC Mixed 10
2% 10.8 Pts
MC Int 15
MC Float 6.8
MC Mixed 10.4
2% 10.7 Pts
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 4%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$25
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 47 38 37 17 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 29.1
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 31.1
22% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
55% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
7.6% Terrible
MC Read 0.9
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 1.2
5% 1.73 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 1.5
5% 1.73 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.6%
Great: 27%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $356Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $92
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $139Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $208Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $108Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $93
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $90SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $41G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $601SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $95SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback