Positivo POS-VVCN896BD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 2.44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemPositivo POS-VVCN896BD  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-VVCN896BD
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '19 at 16:57
Run Duration835 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
VIA C7-D 1800MHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
2.44% Terrible
1-Core 5
2-Core 8.3
3% 6.65 Pts
4-Core 10
8-Core 10.3
1% 10.1 Pts
64-Core 10.4
1% 10.4 Pts
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 4%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$25
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 47 38 37 17 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 29.1
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 31.1
22% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
55% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled
7.6% Terrible
MC Read 0.9
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 1.2
5% 1.73 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 1.5
5% 1.73 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.6%
Great: 28%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 5700 $370Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $334AMD RX 590 $186Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback