Lenovo 20BV003NUK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20BV003NUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BV003NUK
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180914
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateNov 03 '18 at 16:58
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Memory 48.2
1-Core 14.9
2-Core 36.6
24% 33.2 Pts
4-Core 64.3
8-Core 65.1
9% 64.7 Pts
64-Core 64.7
4% 64.7 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5034) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Lighting 6.27
Reflection 7.54
Parallax 6.72
5% 6.84 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 4.97
Splatting 11.5
7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH2OA470
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 106 90 104 112 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 69.2
Write 95.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 103
54% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 0467 RMT3170ME68F9F1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.4% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 6.8
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback