Alienware Area 51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Area 51  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0XDJ4C
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101109
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 01 '16 at 19:41
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 990-$499
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 95.6
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 179
73% 122 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 563
54% 448 Pts
64-Core 694
43% 694 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
AMD(1002 0B00) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 24.3
Parallax 27.4
22% 26.3 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 26.3
Splatting 30.2
22% 26.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
ProgramFiles 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: n/a
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
UserData 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.3% Above average
Read 162
Write 16.9
Mixed 30.4
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 0.41
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 3 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 18.9
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.2
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 55.4
72% 55.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Area 51 Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Alienware Area 51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback