ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Supermicro X8DTN+-F
Memory	29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110803
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '18 at 13:39
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670 4,676 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	61.1% Good	Memory 67.1 1-Core 71.1 2-Core 150 56% 95.9 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 513 49% 405 Pts	64-Core 1,179 73% 1,179 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Asus(1043 045D) 1GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.10.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 17.7 Reflection 16.4 Parallax 22.1 14% 18.8 fps	MRender 13.4 Gravity 16 Splatting 18.6 13% 16 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: BBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 97 83 94 90 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 262 Write 124 Mixed 174 SusWrite 91.2 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 29.2 96% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 34.6 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 41.8 42% 65.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 8x4GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 8 of 18 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 13 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 9.3 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback