ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Supermicro X8DTN+-F
Memory	30.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110803
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '18 at 15:47
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670 4,676 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 66.4 1-Core 74.4 2-Core 154 56% 98.3 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 514 52% 419 Pts	64-Core 1,138 70% 1,138 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Asus(1043 045D) 1GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.10.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Lighting 19.3 Reflection 17.9 Parallax 24.2 16% 20.4 fps	MRender 14.6 Gravity 17.6 Splatting 19.9 14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: 600ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 98 92 99 88 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 163 Write 124 Mixed 134 SusWrite 93 29% 129 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 42.2 4K Mixed 24.8 66% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 26.1 DQ Write 88.2 DQ Mixed 30 31% 48.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 8x4GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 8 of 18 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 13.9 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 9.6 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback