Biostar A960D+

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar A960D+ (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130115
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 30 '18 at 21:25
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Memory 81 1-Core 50.8 2-Core 93.8 49% 75.2 Pts	4-Core 139 8-Core 228 22% 183 Pts	64-Core 226 14% 226 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 098F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	3.44% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 5.12 Parallax 3.44 4% 4.28 fps	MRender 4.38 Gravity 4.6 Splatting 3.39 3% 4.12 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.44% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB 21,984 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 9.1 7 8 6.3 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.8% Very poor	Read 147 Write 13.5 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 9.6 10% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 8.4 26% 7.63 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 56%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 774GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 17 13 14 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 96.8 Write 99.2 Mixed 12.8 SusWrite 16.8 41% 56.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 107%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 254GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 72 70 71 67 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 97 Write 95.7 Mixed 73 SusWrite 69.6 62% 83.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	35.2% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 12.4 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 9.3 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A960D+ Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+

CPU
FX-6350 Six-CoreAMD $100Bench 59%, 29,222 samples	10x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	10x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	4x

SSD
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	2x
TS120GSSD220S 120GBTranscendBench 70%, 8,401 samples	2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	7x
F3-1600C11-4GNS F3-1600C11-4GNS 8GBUnknownBench 35%, 56 samples	3x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 1,247 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $251

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16