Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime20.8 Days
Run DateOct 30 '18 at 18:18
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 52.1
2-Core 106
51% 80 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 294
28% 231 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.98
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Lighting 68.9
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 61
56% 66.1 fps
MRender 73
Gravity 62.9
Splatting 53.7
51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 415
Write 392
Mixed 303
82% 370 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 33.9
117% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 31.5
DQ Write 89.8
DQ Mixed 40.5
37% 53.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 97%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 138
Write 92
Mixed 90.5
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
742GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2322
Write 38.2
Mixed 70.8
582% 810 MB/s
4K Read 245
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 3.1
10,583% 83.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 11.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback