Lenovo 20HF0001GE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 29% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20HF0001GE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HF0001GE
Memory8.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180704
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateOct 30 '18 at 08:41
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 38%
CPU Throttled 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Memory 46.4
1-Core 49.1
2-Core 71.2
35% 55.6 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 152
17% 135 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 224B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6223
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.68% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.65
Parallax 3.84
3% 4.5 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 3.63
Splatting 7.74
4% 5.19 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 558
Write 660
Mixed 399
120% 539 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 11.7
41% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 166
125% 167 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC Kingston 9905630-031.A00G 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 11.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20HF0001GE Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20HF0001GE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback