bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150917
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 29 '18 at 17:43
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
CPU socket #0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 73
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 77.9
49% 73.9 Pts
4-Core 79.7
8-Core 78.9
11% 79.3 Pts
64-Core 56.3
4% 56.3 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 64GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 13 17 17 17 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 204
Write 16.9
Mixed 36.4
SusWrite 16.2
50% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
247% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 64 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 16
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 16
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback